Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty order levied under Section 67 of the KVAT Act was liable to be set aside for denial of copies or inspection of the documents relied on in the notice.
Analysis: The notice proposing penalty relied on several documents, but the person proceeded against sought copies of those documents and received no response. The penalty was then imposed without either furnishing the documents or allowing inspection. Where adverse material is relied upon, fairness requires that the affected person be given the material or an opportunity to peruse it before a final decision is taken.
Conclusion: The penalty order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice and was set aside.