Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the present writ petition challenging the action under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 was maintainable after the petitioner had earlier withdrawn a similar writ petition without liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
Analysis: The earlier writ petition challenging the same recovery and possession proceedings had been withdrawn with liberty only to approach the concerned authorities for re-scheduling of dues and consideration of representations. No permission had been granted to institute a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. In these circumstances, the subsequent challenge to the same action after a long lapse of time could not be entertained.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not maintainable and was liable to be dismissed.