Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1991 (9) TMI 52 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee-Club Income: Tax Exemption Upheld on Mutuality Principle The Tribunal held that the assessee-club is a 'mutual concern' and that the income derived from house property and the sale of liquor to its members and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Assessee-Club Income: Tax Exemption Upheld on Mutuality Principle

                          The Tribunal held that the assessee-club is a 'mutual concern' and that the income derived from house property and the sale of liquor to its members and their guests is not taxable based on the principle of mutuality. The court emphasized that the principle of mutuality applies to transactions with members but not with non-members or temporary members, overturning a previous decision and ruling in favor of the club on all issues.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the assessee-club is a 'mutual concern'.
                          2. Whether the income derived by the assessee club from its house property let to its members and their guests is chargeable to tax.
                          3. Whether the income derived by the assessee club from the sale of liquor, etc., to its members and their guests is taxable.

                          Summary:

                          Issue 1: Mutual Concern
                          The Tribunal held that the assessee-club is a 'mutual concern'. The assessee, Ranchi Club Limited, is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, and limited by guarantee. The memorandum of association indicates that its main object is to provide a club house and other conveniences for its members and their friends. The articles of association create classes of members including temporary members, honorary members, lady members, and patrons, but only permanent members are deemed to be members of the company. The Tribunal's decision was based on the principle of mutuality, which was previously upheld in the case of Bankipur Club Ltd. [1981] 129 ITR 787 (Patna).

                          Issue 2: Income from House Property
                          The Tribunal held that the income derived by the assessee club from its house property let to its members and their guests is not chargeable to tax. The assessee had filed its return showing income under the head "House property" from persons other than members. The Income-tax Officer included the amount received from members as well. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner deleted these additions, and the Tribunal upheld this decision, citing the principle of mutuality. The Tribunal's view was that the receipts from members and their guests cannot be subjected to assessment.

                          Issue 3: Income from Sale of Liquor
                          The Tribunal held that the income derived by the assessee club from the sale of liquor, etc., to its members and their guests is not taxable. This decision was consistent with the principle of mutuality, which exempts surplus receipts from members over expenses from being considered as income. The Tribunal's decision was based on the precedent set in Bankipur Club Ltd. [1981] 129 ITR 787 (Patna), where it was held that transactions with members do not constitute a commercial activity.

                          Comprehensive Details:

                          Principle of Mutuality:
                          The principle of mutuality is based on the premise that no person can make a profit out of himself. For a club to claim exemption under this principle, the contributors to the common fund and the participators in the surplus must be an identical body. The court referred to CIT v. Merchant Navy Club [1974] 96 ITR 261, which summarized the principle of mutuality, emphasizing that the surplus from transactions with members is not assessable to tax if it is to be refunded to the members.

                          Transactions with Non-Members:
                          The court clarified that the principle of mutuality does not apply to transactions with non-members. If a club indulges in both mutual and non-mutual activities, it can still claim exemption for mutual activities. This was supported by cases like CIT v. Madras Race Club [1976] 105 ITR 433 (Mad) and Carlisle and Silloth Golf Club v. Smith [1912] 6 TC 48 (KB).

                          Temporary Members:
                          The court held that temporary members are not considered members of the club for the purpose of mutuality. They do not contribute to the assets of the company, guarantee its debts, or participate in its management. Therefore, transactions with temporary members do not qualify for exemption under the principle of mutuality.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court overruled the decision in Ranchi Club's case [1987] 168 ITR 120 (Patna) and held that the assessee-club can claim exemption on the principle of mutuality for transactions with its members. The court answered all three questions in the affirmative and against the Department, emphasizing that the principle of mutuality applies to transactions with members, but not with non-members or temporary members.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found