Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported barcode printers were required to declare maximum retail price under the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977, and consequently whether additional duty of customs was chargeable on the basis of retail sale price under Section 3(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: Rule 2A of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 exempts packaged commodities meant for an industrial consumer or an institutional consumer. The exemption depends on the nature of the buyer and the end use of the goods. On the facts, the imported printers were found to be meant for retail sale and not for use by a service industry such as transportation, hotel, or any similar service industry. The article was also notified under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, satisfying the statutory condition for adoption of retail price-based valuation.
Conclusion: The printers were liable to bear maximum retail price and the additional duty of customs was correctly assessable on retail sale price basis. The appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was sustained and the customs valuation adopted by the revenue authorities was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported packaged goods are not shown to fall within the industrial or institutional consumer exemption, retail price marking is mandatory and additional duty may be computed on retail sale price basis under the Customs Tariff Act.