Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (8) TMI 393 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal: VSAT charges not under TDS; Assessing Officer to review transaction charges The Tribunal held that VSAT charges are not subject to TDS as they do not constitute payments for technical services under Chapter XVII of the I.T. Act. ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal: VSAT charges not under TDS; Assessing Officer to review transaction charges

                            The Tribunal held that VSAT charges are not subject to TDS as they do not constitute payments for technical services under Chapter XVII of the I.T. Act. Regarding transaction charges, the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the A.O. to determine if the assessee's decade-long belief regarding non-deduction of TDS was bona fide, instructing a fresh decision in light of relevant case law. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for reassessment of the transaction charges issue by the A.O. to ensure a fair opportunity for the assessee.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether tax is required to be deducted under Chapter XVIIB of the I.T. Act on VSAT charges paid by the assessee to the stock exchanges.
                            2. Whether tax is required to be deducted under Chapter XVIIB of the I.T. Act on transaction charges paid by the assessee to the stock exchanges.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Tax Deduction on VSAT Charges
                            Facts and Arguments:
                            - The assessee, engaged in share broking, did not deduct TDS on VSAT charges amounting to Rs. 4,47,855/-.
                            - The assessee argued that VSAT charges, which include bandwidth charges, are for data transmission and do not constitute technical services.
                            - The Assessing Officer (A.O.) disallowed the deduction of VSAT charges under section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, asserting that they were liable for TDS.

                            CIT(A) Decision:
                            - The CIT(A) referenced the ITAT Mumbai decision in CIT vs. Angel Broking Ltd., which held that VSAT charges are not technical services and thus not subject to TDS.

                            Tribunal's Analysis:
                            - The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, citing the Bombay High Court's ruling in ITO v/s. Angel Capital, which confirmed that VSAT charges are not technical services and hence not liable for TDS.
                            - The Tribunal reiterated that VSAT charges are merely reimbursements to the stock exchange for payments made to the Department of Telecommunication, lacking any element of income.

                            Conclusion:
                            - The Tribunal concluded that VSAT charges are not payments for technical services and thus not subject to TDS under Chapter XVII of the I.T. Act.

                            Issue 2: Tax Deduction on Transaction Charges
                            Facts and Arguments:
                            - The assessee did not deduct TDS on transaction charges amounting to Rs. 8,21,754/-, arguing that these are levied by stock exchanges based on transaction volume and do not constitute technical or managerial services.
                            - The A.O. disallowed the deduction, asserting that transaction charges are payments for services and thus liable for TDS.

                            CIT(A) Decision:
                            - The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's argument, referencing the ITAT Mumbai decision in Kotak Securities Ltd. vs Addl. CIT, which held that transaction fees are payments for the use of facilities and not for technical or managerial services.

                            Tribunal's Analysis:
                            - The Tribunal noted the Bombay High Court's decision in Kotak Securities, which held that transaction charges are fees for technical services under section 194J but granted relief to the assessee due to a decade-long bona fide belief that TDS was not applicable.
                            - The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the A.O. to ascertain whether the assessee's bona fide belief was entertained in earlier assessments, instructing the A.O. to decide the issue afresh in light of the Kotak Securities case.

                            Conclusion:
                            - The Tribunal directed the A.O. to re-examine the bona fide belief of the assessee regarding the non-deduction of TDS on transaction charges and to decide the issue afresh, ensuring fair opportunity for the assessee to be heard.

                            Final Order:
                            - The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to the A.O. to reassess the bona fide belief regarding TDS on transaction charges. The order was pronounced in the open court on 15.6.2012.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found