Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to be considered for the benefit of Notification No. 6/2005-ST in respect of travel agent services and whether the matter required remand for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The service rendered by the appellant was ed as falling under travel agent services. The appellant raised a plea that the turnover for the relevant period did not exceed the threshold for the small scale service provider benefit, but that plea had not been examined by the lower authorities. The Tribunal held that the statutory benefit ought not to be denied merely because a specific claim had not been made earlier and that the plea required consideration by the adjudicating authority in the proper factual and legal setting. As the issue had not been examined below, the matter was remitted for reconsideration after observing the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The appellant's plea for exemption under Notification No. 6/2005-ST was left open for fresh consideration and the impugned order was set aside with remand.