Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale proceeds from the sale of old and uneconomic trees were capital receipts not exigible to agricultural income-tax, and whether the matter required remand for determining the value of latex and scrap.
Analysis: The sale was found, on the material on record, to relate to plantations that had become almost dry, had been completely removed and cleared for replanting, and no latex was available for extraction at the relevant time. The final fact-finding authority accepted that the receipts represented the value of the trees sold and not income from latex extraction. In these circumstances, the earlier decision directing remand on a different factual basis was held distinguishable, and no further inquiry by the assessing authority was considered necessary.
Conclusion: The sale proceeds were held to be capital in nature and not liable to tax, and the request for remand was rejected.