TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court rules on separate assessments under Income-tax Act, 1961 for pre and post firm dissolution</h1> The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that Section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied over Section 187, necessitating separate ... Succession Issues Involved:1. Applicability of Section 187 or Section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Justification of a single assessment for the entire assessment year 1977-78.3. Entitlement to continuation of registration for the period from April 1, 1976, to June 30, 1976.4. Validity of the partnership deed dated September 22, 1976.Detailed Analysis:1. Applicability of Section 187 or Section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The primary issue was whether the Tribunal was justified in applying Section 187 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, instead of Section 188. The firm, originally constituted by two partners, saw one partner retire on June 30, 1976, and the business continued with the remaining partner and new partners under a new deed. The Tribunal held that since one of the original partners continued, Section 187 was applicable, indicating a reconstitution rather than a succession. However, the court concluded that the retirement of one of the two partners resulted in the dissolution of the firm, making Section 188 applicable. This necessitated separate assessments for the periods before and after the dissolution.2. Justification of a Single Assessment for the Entire Assessment Year 1977-78:The Tribunal supported the Income-tax Officer's decision to compute the income for the entire assessment year 1977-78 under one assessment, considering it a reconstitution under Section 187. The court, however, found this incorrect, ruling that the firm was dissolved upon the retirement of one partner, and thus, separate assessments should have been made for the two periods as per Section 188. The court upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax's direction for two separate assessments.3. Entitlement to Continuation of Registration for the Period from April 1, 1976, to June 30, 1976:The Tribunal and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had upheld the continuation of registration for the period from April 1, 1976, to June 30, 1976. The court agreed, stating that the erstwhile firm was entitled to continuation of registration for this period, as the partnership was valid and genuine.4. Validity of the Partnership Deed Dated September 22, 1976:The Tribunal found no infirmity in the partnership deed dated September 22, 1976, which formed the new partnership after the retirement of one partner. The court concurred, noting that the minors were not admitted to the benefits of the partnership and were not liable for losses, thus validating the partnership deed.Conclusion:The court answered all questions in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue, upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax's orders regarding the applicability of Section 188, the necessity for separate assessments, the continuation of registration, and the validity of the partnership deed. The reference was disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
