Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cooling zone of a hot air stenter could be counted as a chamber for determining annual production capacity under the Hot Air Stenter Independent Textile Processors Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1998.
Analysis: The relevant explanation to rule 5 treated only a float drying machine or any other equipment, except the galleries of specified length, as one chamber if it was installed in or attached to the stenter and if it aided the process of heat setting or drying of fabrics. The cooling zone in question was neither installed in nor attached to the stenter, and it did not aid heat setting or drying but only cooled the fabrics after they emerged from the stenter. On that statutory test, inclusion of the cooling zone in the chamber count was not permissible.
Conclusion: The exclusion of the cooling zone from the computation of chambers was warranted and the assessee succeeded on the issue.
Final Conclusion: The capacity determination was modified by deleting the cooling zone from the chamber calculation, and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: For chamber-based capacity determination under the 1998 Rules, only equipment installed in or attached to the stenter and used for heat setting or drying can be counted as a chamber; a cooling zone that merely cools the fabric cannot be included.