Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amount received on release and relinquishment of tenancy rights was taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. (ii) Whether the capital gains arising on sale of shares of a closely held company, whose value was derived principally from immovable property in India, were taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and whether tax deducted at source was to be credited.
Issue (i): Whether the amount received on release and relinquishment of tenancy rights was taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Analysis: The admitted question did not involve determination of fair market value. Tenancy rights in respect of real estate were treated as gains arising from alienation of immovable property. Since the immovable property was situated in India, the gains fell within the India taxation article applicable to immovable property.
Conclusion: The amount received for release and relinquishment of tenancy rights was taxable in India under Article 13(1) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Issue (ii): Whether the capital gains arising on sale of shares of a closely held company, whose value was derived principally from immovable property in India, were taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and whether tax deducted at source was to be credited.
Analysis: The question also did not involve determination of fair market value. The shares were not quoted on a recognised stock exchange, and their value was derived principally from immovable property situated in India. On that basis, the gains were held taxable in India under the treaty provision dealing with such property-linked share transfers. The tax already deducted at source was directed to be given credit against any tax demand, on verification.
Conclusion: The capital gains on sale of shares were taxable in India under Article 13(4) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and credit for tax deducted at source was allowable on proper verification.
Final Conclusion: The ruling determined that both the tenancy-rights consideration and the share-sale gains were taxable in India under the treaty, while preserving credit for tax already deducted at source.
Ratio Decidendi: Where gains arise from immovable property situated in India, or from shares whose value is derived principally from such immovable property, the treaty allocates taxing rights to India under the relevant capital gains article.