Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount contributed by the principal employer towards EPF and ESI could be included in the taxable value for manpower supply service, and whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of dues and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The appellants were charging service tax on the gross amount received for manpower supply. The Revenue sought to include the EPF and ESI contributions made by the principal employer in the taxable value. The Court found that the liability to pay EPF and ESI rested on the principal employer, who was discharging that obligation, and that such amounts did not form part of the consideration received by the appellants for providing manpower supply services. On that basis, the appellants established a strong prima facie case for interim relief.
Conclusion: The EPF and ESI contributions were not to be treated as consideration for manpower supply service at the interim stage, and waiver of dues with stay of recovery was granted during pendency of the appeals.