TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal denies stay application, directs deposit due to lack of exemption eligibility under Cenvat Credit Rules</h1> <h3>SANGAM STRUCTURALS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., ALLAHABAD</h3> SANGAM STRUCTURALS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., ALLAHABAD - 2011 (272) E.L.T. 79 (Tri. - Del.) Issues:Application for stay of recovery order passed by Commissioner, Allahabad regarding payment of duty on exempted goods under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.Analysis:1. Facts of the Case: The appellants were engaged in manufacturing steel structures and availing Cenvat credit facility. They supplied goods to ABB Ltd. for a project with Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., partly on payment of duty and partly without payment under exemption notification.2. Contentions of Appellants: The appellants argued that the goods supplied were for an international competitive bidding project and should be exempt under Rule 6(6)(vii)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules and Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. They contended that the authorities erred in their classification under the exemption notification.3. Respondent's Argument: The DR argued that the Commissioner correctly analyzed the case and denied the benefit claimed by the appellants. He stated that there was no basis for waiving the demanded amount.4. Observations and Analysis: The Commissioner found that the goods supplied were not against international competitive bidding as per certificates provided by ABB Ltd. and Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. The provisions under Rule 6(6)(vii)(a) and Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. apply to goods supplied 'against' international competitive bidding, which the appellants did not meet.5. Decision: The Tribunal held that the appellants failed to qualify for the exemption and directed them to deposit a sum of Rs. 27 Lakhs within 8 weeks, waiving the balance amount till the appeal's disposal. The Tribunal noted that the observations were prima facie views and no case for total waiver was established.6. Extended Period and Suppression of Facts: The Tribunal clarified that the period involved did not warrant an extended period or suppression of facts as the show cause notice was issued within a reasonable timeframe from the period in question.In conclusion, the Tribunal denied the appellants' stay application, emphasizing that the benefit of exemption under Cenvat Credit Rules and relevant notifications applied only to goods supplied directly against international competitive bidding, which the appellants failed to demonstrate. The decision highlighted the importance of meeting specific criteria for exemption eligibility and directed partial deposit of the demanded amount pending appeal resolution.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
