Karnataka HC dismisses revenue's appeal due to lack of evidence, grants liberty to appeal to SC. The Karnataka HC dismissed the revenue's appeal for lack of evidence supporting clandestine removal of goods, citing Section 35L of the Act. The court ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Karnataka HC dismisses revenue's appeal due to lack of evidence, grants liberty to appeal to SC.
The Karnataka HC dismissed the revenue's appeal for lack of evidence supporting clandestine removal of goods, citing Section 35L of the Act. The court granted liberty for the revenue to appeal to the SC.
The Karnataka High Court rejected the revenue's appeal challenging a tribunal order due to lack of corroborative evidence for clandestine removal of goods. The court stated that the issue falls under Section 35L of the Act and reserved liberty for the revenue to appeal to the Apex Court.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.