TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Customs Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Authorization and Unsatisfactory Reasons</h1> The appeal filed by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai due to lack of authorization for ... Condoning the delay - Issue involved in this case is sensitive in nature, a proper care is made in deciding the quantum of ground on which appeal has to be filed - The delay is not intentional - No authorization to file the application for condonation of delay, the reason given for the delay is highly unsatisfactory - Find that the lower appellate authority has asked the original authority to hear the appellants and pass a speaking order - Therefore, it is not obvious how the case is sensitive in nature requiring more time to consider filing an appeal - Hence, is not a fit case for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai dismissed the appeal filed by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs due to lack of authorization for condonation of delay and unsatisfactory reasons provided for the delay. The appeal, along with the stay petition and condonation of delay application, was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
