TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay in filing the appeal could be condoned when the filing of the condonation application was not expressly authorised and the explanation for delay was found unsatisfactory.
Analysis: The authorization produced covered filing of the appeal and the stay petition, but did not authorise filing of the condonation application. The explanation for the 11-day delay was also found inadequate, as the stated sensitivity of the issue did not justify the additional time taken to finalise the appeal papers.
Conclusion: The delay was not condoned and the appeal, along with the stay petition, was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
