Court quashes order for errors, directs new officer for appeal hearing. Allegations deemed admitted. The court set aside and quashed the impugned order of the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade, Kolkata, due to discrepancies and errors in the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court quashes order for errors, directs new officer for appeal hearing. Allegations deemed admitted.
The court set aside and quashed the impugned order of the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade, Kolkata, due to discrepancies and errors in the order, including failure to consider an adjournment petition. The court directed that any future hearing of the appeal should be conducted by a different officer. The writ petition was disposed of at the admission stage without calling for affidavits, with allegations deemed admitted by the respondents. No costs were awarded, and parties were instructed to act based on the signed copy of the order's operative part.
Issues: Challenge to order of Additional Director General of Foreign Trade dismissing appeals on various grounds.
Analysis: The petitioner challenged the order dated 28th November, 2006 passed by the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade, Kolkata, dismissing appeals against the orders dated 14th February, 2007 and 16th February, 2007 by the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Kolkata. The court noted discrepancies in the order, such as recording dates in 2007 for proceedings when the order was passed in 2006. The court found it strange that such errors were made by a high-ranking official. Additionally, the court observed that an adjournment petition sent by email on 6th November, 2007 was not considered, further undermining the validity of the impugned order. Consequently, the court set aside and quashed the impugned order, allowing the writ petition and directing that any future hearing of the appeal should be conducted by an officer other than the one who passed the original order.
The court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage without calling for affidavits, indicating that the allegations made in the petition were deemed admitted by the respondents. No costs were awarded in the judgment. Furthermore, all parties involved were instructed to act based on a signed copy of the minutes of the operative part of the order, subject to the usual undertakings.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.