Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether remission of duty under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was available for aerated water bottles claimed to be unfit for consumption or marketing after the best before date.
Analysis: Rule 21 permits remission where goods are claimed by the manufacturer to be unfit for consumption or for marketing. The record showed that the appellant treated the goods as not marketable under its policy and that the goods were destroyed in the presence of excise . The department did not take steps to the destruction or establish by evidence that the goods remained fit for consumption or marketing. On these facts, the view taken by the Commissioner (Appeals) that remission was not available could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Remission of duty was available to the assessee, and the order denying remission was set aside.