Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2009 (10) TMI 578 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Deduction for Dividend Income: Gross vs. Net Basis Decision The case involved the issue of whether the deduction under section 80M of the Income Tax Act is available for dividend income and whether it should be ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tax Deduction for Dividend Income: Gross vs. Net Basis Decision

                          The case involved the issue of whether the deduction under section 80M of the Income Tax Act is available for dividend income and whether it should be allowed on a gross or net basis. The Tribunal decided that the deduction under section 80M should be allowed on a gross basis for dividend income, except for dividends from UTI, which should be on a net basis. The order of the CIT(A) was partly set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction accordingly. The appeals filed by the Revenue were partly allowed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the deduction under section 80M of the Income Tax Act is available in respect of dividend income.
                          2. Whether the deduction under section 80M should be allowed on a gross basis or net basis.

                          Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Deduction under Section 80M for Dividend Income:
                          - The Tribunal initially adjudicated the appeals, including the assessee's appeals, and later reconsidered the issue of section 80M deduction for dividend income.
                          - The Tribunal recalled its order to adjudicate whether section 80M deduction is available for dividend income, regardless of whether it is assessed as business income or income from other sources.
                          - The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous petition filed by the assessee, thus recalling the order to determine if the deduction under section 80M is available for dividend income and whether it should be allowed on a gross or net basis.

                          2. Gross vs. Net Basis for Section 80M Deduction:
                          - The Departmental Representative argued that the assessee had conceded before the Assessing Officer (AO) for restriction, and thus, the assessee should not have filed an appeal, and the CIT(A) should not have adjudicated the appeal.
                          - The Departmental Representative relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Motilal Pesticides (I) (P) Ltd. vs. CIT, arguing that the deduction under section 80M should only be allowed on a net basis.
                          - The assessee's counsel argued that even if dividend income is classified as business income, section 80M deduction cannot be denied, and referred to various judicial decisions supporting the deduction on a gross basis.
                          - The Tribunal considered the rival submissions and noted that the assessee's representative had only conceded in respect of dividend from UTI, not for other shares.
                          - The Tribunal concluded that for the dividend from UTI, the deduction under section 80M should be allowed on a net basis, while for other shares, it should be allowed on a gross basis.

                          Separate Judgments by Judges:
                          - One member, U.B.S. Bedi, disagreed with the findings regarding the allowability of section 80M deduction on a gross or net basis, citing the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT vs. Chemical Holdings Ltd., which held that the deduction should be on the net dividend.
                          - The Third Member, Pradeep Parikh, was nominated to resolve the difference of opinion. He examined the facts and concluded that the assessee's activities constituted an indivisible business, and therefore, the dividend income should be treated as business income, eligible for deduction under section 80M on a gross basis.

                          Final Decision:
                          - The majority view, including the Third Member's opinion, held that the deduction under section 80M should be allowed on a gross basis for dividend income, except for the dividend from UTI, which should be on a net basis.
                          - Consequently, the order of the CIT(A) was partly set aside, and the AO was directed to allow the deduction under section 80M on a net basis for UTI dividends and on a gross basis for other shares.
                          - The appeals filed by the Revenue were partly allowed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found