Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the unabsorbed expenditure incurred for setting up a branch could be claimed in full in the year of closure of that branch, instead of continuing to be amortised in equal instalments over the remaining years.
Analysis: The assessee had adopted a consistent accounting practice of spreading the initial branch and head-office expenditure over ten years. The closure of one branch did not create any legal basis for accelerating the deduction of the balance amount in the year of closure. No provision in the Act permitted the entire expenditure incurred for setting up the branch to be claimed at once merely because the branch had been closed. Since the assessee had already followed a phased write-off method accepted by the Department, the remaining unabsorbed expenditure was required to be apportioned over the balance period along with the other carried forward expenditure.
Conclusion: The claim for immediate deduction of the unabsorbed branch expenditure in the year of closure was rejected, and the Tribunal's view sustaining amortisation over the remaining years was upheld in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a business expenditure for setting up a branch has been accepted as deductible by way of phased amortisation, closure of that branch does not entitle the assessee to claim the balance expenditure in full in the year of closure absent a statutory provision permitting such acceleration.