1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Chennai: Confiscation of 'Buff Sole Leather' classified as finished leather. Impugned order set aside.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, Vice-President, in a case involving the confiscation of export goods described as ... Confiscation - absence of any prescription of the degree/percentage of tanning in the definition of 'finished leather', the goods cannot be held to be other than finished leather β penalty set aside The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President, in a case involving the confiscation of export goods described as 'Buff Sole Leather.' The tribunal found that the goods should be considered finished leather as there was no specific requirement for the degree of tanning in the definition of 'finished leather.' The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.