Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2008 (9) TMI 575 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds denial of waiver on tax credit; orders reversal on insurance premia. The Tribunal upheld the original authority's decision, denying the appellant's request for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for demanded amounts ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal upholds denial of waiver on tax credit; orders reversal on insurance premia.

                              The Tribunal upheld the original authority's decision, denying the appellant's request for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for demanded amounts related to credit on capital goods and service tax on maintenance of a windmill. The appellant failed to establish a strong case against the imposed demand, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal ordered the reversal of credit on insurance premia within a specified period, with a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for the remaining amounts pending final appeal disposal.




                              Issues:
                              1. Waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery of demanded amounts.
                              2. Admissibility of credit availed on duty paid on a gear box and service tax on maintenance and repairs of a windmill.
                              3. Interpretation of 'input services' under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
                              4. Applicability of service tax on insurance premia as an 'input service' for manufacturing operations.

                              Analysis:

                              Issue 1 - Waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery:
                              The appellant sought waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery of demanded amounts, including interest, based on the orders-in-original. The Commissioner (A) upheld the original authority's decision, leading to the impugned order. The appellant argued that the windmill's power generation, even located away from the factory, should entitle them to credit on capital goods and service tax on maintenance. However, the SDR opposed, stating that the windmill's activities did not have a direct nexus with manufacturing excisable goods. The Tribunal found the appellant failed to establish a strong case against the demand, interest, and penalty imposed. The Tribunal ordered the reversal of credit on insurance premia within a specified period, with a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for the remaining amounts until final disposal of the appeal.

                              Issue 2 - Admissibility of credit on gear box and maintenance service tax:
                              The appellant, engaged in manufacturing viscose yarn, availed MODVAT credit on a gear box used in a windmill located away from the factory. They also claimed credit on service tax for windmill maintenance. The original authority demanded the inadmissible credit, imposing penalties under CENVAT Credit Rules. The Commissioner (A) upheld this decision, stating that the windmill's capital goods and maintenance services did not directly contribute to the manufacturing operations. The Tribunal acknowledged the contentious nature of the issue, requiring detailed arguments at the final hearing stage to determine admissibility.

                              Issue 3 - Interpretation of 'input services' under CENVAT Credit Rules:
                              The Commissioner (A) found that the windmill's maintenance and repair services did not fall under the definition of 'input services' under CENVAT Credit Rules. The capital goods in the windmill were considered separate from those in the factory directly involved in manufacturing operations. Similarly, insurance services for employees were not deemed 'input services' related to manufacturing or clearance of final products. The Tribunal noted the evolving nature of tax laws and technology, suggesting that future provisions might explicitly cover such activities for credit eligibility.

                              Issue 4 - Applicability of service tax on insurance premia:
                              The appellant argued that service tax on insurance premia for factory workers should qualify as an 'input service' under the CENVAT scheme. However, the SDR contended that such service tax did not directly contribute to manufacturing or product clearance. The Tribunal agreed with the SDR, ordering the reversal of credit on insurance premia within a specified period. Compliance was required by a set date, with a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for the remaining amounts until final disposal of the appeal.

                              This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues, arguments presented by both parties, and the Tribunal's findings regarding the admissibility of credits and the interpretation of relevant legal provisions under the CENVAT Credit Rules.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found