Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether chilling of milk amounts to manufacture under Note 6 of Chapter 4 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and consequently whether service tax is leviable on the activity under Business Auxiliary Service.
Analysis: The activity of chilling milk was held to be a treatment that renders the milk marketable. Since the process enables the product to be sold to consumers located at distant places, it falls within the statutory concept of manufacture under Note 6 of Chapter 4 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Once the activity is treated as manufacture, it cannot simultaneously be taxed as a service under the category of Business Auxiliary Service.
Conclusion: The service tax demand and penalties were unsustainable and were set aside, resulting in allowance of the appeal in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A process that renders milk marketable and amounts to manufacture under Note 6 of Chapter 4 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is not chargeable to service tax as Business Auxiliary Service.