Appeal dismissed due to excessive delay in application with no satisfactory explanation. The Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, in 2006 (9) TMI 584, rejected an application for condonation of delay due to a delay of over 870 days with no ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal dismissed due to excessive delay in application with no satisfactory explanation.
The Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, in 2006 (9) TMI 584, rejected an application for condonation of delay due to a delay of over 870 days with no satisfactory explanation. The appeal was not admitted.
The judgment by the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, in 2006 (9) TMI 584 stated that an application for condonation of delay was rejected due to a delay of over 870 days with no satisfactory explanation provided. The appeal was not admitted.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.