TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court dismisses petition for security deposit refund, directs arbitration or civil court</h1> <h3>M/s A.K. Constructions Through Its Partner A.K. Chaturvedi Versus State Of U.P. Thr. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Forests, Lucknow & Others</h3> M/s A.K. Constructions Through Its Partner A.K. Chaturvedi Versus State Of U.P. Thr. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Forests, Lucknow & Others - TMI The petitioner sought a money decree for a refund of a security deposit related to a contract. The court ruled that such claims must be pursued through arbitration or civil court, not under Article 226 of the Constitution. The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to seek remedies through proper legal channels.
TaxTMI 