TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Contractor granted exemption under section 10(26AAA) for Sikkim income in 2004-05 assessment year</h1> <h3>Sonam Topgay Bhutia Versus D.C.I.T, Circle-2, Siliguri</h3> Sonam Topgay Bhutia Versus D.C.I.T, Circle-2, Siliguri - TMI Issues involved: Appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding the applicability of section 10(26AAA) u/s. 143(3)/147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2004-05.Summary:Issue 1: Reopening of Assessment and Applicability of Section 10(26AAA)The assessee, a contractor, filed an appeal against the assessment order for the year 2004-05. The case was reopened, and the assessment was completed u/s. 143(3)/147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee claimed exemption u/s. 10(26AAA) for income accrued in Sikkim, citing the Finance Act, 2008. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) denied the claim, stating that the assessee should have raised the issue before the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that the assessee fulfilled the conditions of section 10(26AAA) and was eligible for exemption, even though the issue arose during the appeal process. The Tribunal emphasized that appellate proceedings are part of assessment proceedings, and the cause of substantial justice should prevail. The order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was set aside, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.Issue 2: Grounds of AppealThe assessee raised multiple grounds of appeal, including denial of section 10(26AAA) benefit, rejection of additional ground to treat income as Nil, and confirmation of alleged concealment of contract receipt. The Tribunal found that since the entire income earned by the assessee was exempt from tax, the other grounds raised by the assessee did not require adjudication. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.This judgment highlights the importance of considering legal claims in appellate proceedings, especially when substantial justice is at stake, and the authority has co-terminous powers with the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal's decision favored the assessee's eligibility for exemption u/s. 10(26AAA) despite the issue arising during the appeal process.
TaxTMI 