TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court allows writ petition, recalls previous judgment, parties consent, quashes circulars, refund duty.</h1> <h3>DSCL Sugar Versus Union of India</h3> DSCL Sugar Versus Union of India - 2017 (355) E.L.T. 61 (All.) Issues involved: Interpretation of previous judgment, application for modification of judgment, delinking of writ petition from previous bunch of writ petitions, recall of judgment, consent of parties.In the present case, the learned Counsel for the petitioner argued that the issue in the instant writ petition had already been addressed in a previous judgment related to a bunch of writ petitions. The previous judgment had quashed certain circulars and a demand notice, with directions for refunding duty and interest. However, due to confusion during arguments, the instant writ petition was delinked from the previous bunch of writ petitions. An application was filed to modify the judgment, which was allowed, recalling the previous judgment. The opposite parties did not dispute that the controversy in the instant writ petition was identical to the previous case. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition was allowed in line with the previous judgment. The office was directed to issue certified copies of both orders to the respective parties as per High Court Rules.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
