Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order refusing recall of PW-9 for further cross-examination under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was liable to be set aside.
Analysis: The petition sought recall of the complainant witness to permit further cross-examination confined to the nature of the weapon used. The refusal by the court below was found unsustainable because cross-examination forms an integral part of the evidence and the accused was entitled to elicit material answers relevant to the charge. The reason recorded by the court below that the application was not bona fide was not accepted on the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The refusal to recall PW-9 was set aside and the petitioner was permitted to further cross-examine PW-9 on the limited point of the nature of the weapon used.
Ratio Decidendi: A witness may be recalled under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, where further cross-examination is necessary to test the evidence and serve the ends of justice.