Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2009 (7) TMI 1314 - Board - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Company Law Board declares removal of directors & share capital increase illegal. Petitioners reinstated, share certificates to be returned. The Company Law Board ruled in favor of the petitioners, declaring the removal of directors, increase in authorized share capital, and allotment of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Company Law Board declares removal of directors & share capital increase illegal. Petitioners reinstated, share certificates to be returned.

                          The Company Law Board ruled in favor of the petitioners, declaring the removal of directors, increase in authorized share capital, and allotment of additional shares as illegal. The petitioners were reinstated as directors, and the respondents were ordered to return the share certificates. The petition was deemed maintainable despite delay and laches in filing. All interim orders were vacated.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Allegations of oppression and mismanagement under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956.
                          2. Validity of the removal of directors.
                          3. Legality of the increase in authorized share capital and allotment of additional shares.
                          4. Alleged fraudulent transfer of shares.
                          5. Maintainability of the petition under Section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956.
                          6. Delay and laches in filing the petition.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Allegations of Oppression and Mismanagement:
                          The petitioners alleged that the respondents engaged in acts of oppression and mismanagement by removing them from the board and reducing their shareholding from 50% to 26.6% without proper notice or following due procedure. The petitioners argued that the respondents manipulated the company's records to gain control and excluded them from the management.

                          2. Validity of the Removal of Directors:
                          The respondents claimed that the petitioners ceased to be directors by operation of law under Section 283(1)(g) of the Companies Act due to their absence from board meetings. However, it was noted that no proper notices were sent to the petitioners regarding the board meetings, and the company was non-functional due to disturbed conditions in Srinagar. The removal was deemed illegal as the statutory precondition of sending notices to the directors was not met.

                          3. Legality of the Increase in Authorized Share Capital and Allotment of Additional Shares:
                          The respondents increased the authorized capital from Rs. 18 lakhs to Rs. 35 lakhs and allotted additional shares to themselves without offering the same to the petitioners. The petitioners contended that no proper meeting was held, and no notices were issued. The increase in capital and allotment of shares were found to be for ulterior and improper motives, lacking probity and good faith, and thus declared illegal.

                          4. Alleged Fraudulent Transfer of Shares:
                          The petitioners argued that the transfer of their shares to the respondents was fraudulent, with no transfer deeds or consideration paid. The respondents failed to provide evidence of the mode and manner of payment. The petitioners highlighted discrepancies in the share certificates and transfer deeds, indicating forged signatures. The transfer was declared invalid.

                          5. Maintainability of the Petition under Section 399:
                          The respondents challenged the maintainability of the petition, arguing that the petitioners did not meet the requisite shareholding percentage under Section 399. However, it was established that the petitioners held 50% shares before the disputed allotment, and the reduction in their shareholding was itself an act of oppression. The petition was deemed maintainable.

                          6. Delay and Laches in Filing the Petition:
                          The respondents argued that the petition was barred by delay and laches. However, it was noted that the petitioners became aware of the acts complained of only after inspecting the Registrar of Companies' records on February 13, 2004, and filed the petition in August 2004. The delay was not considered deliberate or negligent, and the continuous effect of the oppressive acts justified the petition's timeliness.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Company Law Board found in favor of the petitioners, declaring the removal of directors and the increase in authorized share capital and allotment of additional shares as illegal. The petitioners were restored as directors, and the respondents were directed to return the share certificates to the petitioners. The petition was allowed, and all interim orders were vacated.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found