Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the property sought to be attached and sold in execution was a residential house exempt from attachment and sale under Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Analysis: The evidence showed that the building was being used for residential purposes by the judgment-debtor and his family. The existence of a shop on the ground floor did not change the essential character of the property, since Section 60 protects one main residential house together with buildings attached to it and the land necessary for its enjoyment. On the facts found, the property answered that description and therefore fell within the statutory exemption.
Conclusion: The property was held to be a residential house within Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure and was not liable to attachment or sale in execution.