1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court quashes Tribunal's orders, directs petitioner to pay costs, CESTAT to proceed with appeal</h1> The Court quashed the Tribunal's orders and directed the petitioner to pay costs to the respondents within four weeks. Upon payment, the CESTAT was ... - Issues involved: Whether CESTAT was justified in declining to condone the delay in filing the appeal against the original order.Summary:The petitioner initially failed to enclose a doctor's certificate explaining the inability to move during a specific period in the appeal memo. Consequently, the Tribunal refused to condone the delay. Subsequently, the petitioner submitted the required certificate, but the Tribunal still rejected the application. Despite the delay in furnishing the certificate, the Court believed that justice would be served by condoning the delay and hearing the appeal on its merits, with the condition of paying costs. The Court quashed the Tribunal's orders and directed the petitioner to pay costs to the respondents within four weeks. Upon payment, the CESTAT was instructed to proceed with hearing the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
