1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>ITAT Chennai Upholds Deduction & Depreciation Decisions</h1> The Appellate Tribunal ITAT CHENNAI upheld the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the allowance of deduction u/s.80IA and the depreciation rate ... Deduction u/s.80IA - whether each of the windmill was a separate undertaking? - Held that:- As in assessee’s own case for the A.Y. 2006-07 [2015 (10) TMI 2649 - ITAT CHENNAI] observed that each windmill is to be considered independent and separate and as a consequence deduction u/s.80IA to be computed and decided the issue in favour of the assessee. Accordingly, the CIT(Appeals) is justified in allowing the claim of deduction u/s.80IA of the Act to the assesse and this ground of the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Depreciation claim @ 60% on UPS accepted. See [2014 (11) TMI 1121 - ITAT CHENNAI]. Issues:1. Allowance of deduction u/s.80IA of the Income Tax Act.2. Depreciation rate on UPS.Analysis:1. The first issue pertains to the allowance of deduction u/s.80IA of the Income Tax Act. The case involved the appellant challenging the Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) order directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction. The appellant had seven windmills generating power for consumption and supply to TNEB. Each windmill was treated as a separate undertaking based on separate agreements, connections, and approvals. The Tribunal had previously ruled in favor of treating each windmill independently for the purpose of deduction u/s.80IA. The CIT(Appeals) rightly allowed the deduction, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.2. The second issue revolved around the depreciation rate on UPS, where the CIT(Appeals) allowed 60% depreciation instead of the 15% granted by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal referred to a previous order in the appellant's case where similar depreciation treatment was upheld. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground as well, citing consistency with past decisions. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed in its entirety, affirming the decisions made by the lower authorities.In conclusion, the judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT CHENNAI upheld the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the allowance of deduction u/s.80IA and the depreciation rate on UPS. The Tribunal's analysis emphasized consistency with past rulings and treated each issue based on established legal principles and precedents.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
