TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>The SC dismissed the special leave petitions for lack of merit, disposing of pending applications.</h1> The SC dismissed the special leave petitions for lack of merit, disposing of pending applications. - TMI Concealment of income – imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- When the two fact finding authorities have concurrently held that the explanation offered by the assessee is not false, though the assessee has failed to conclusively prove the explanation offered, no case is made out for interference Merely because the assessee agreed for addition and accordingly assessment order was passed on the basis of this addition and when the assessee has paid the tax and the interest thereon in the absence of any material on record to show the concealment of income - it cannot be inferred that the said addition is on account of concealment. The explanation offered by the assessee is not false and it is a bonafide one though the assessee has failed to conclusively prove the explanation offered. HC order confirmed [2013 (7) TMI 620 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] - Decided in favour of assessee. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions as they found no merit in them. Pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
