TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeals dismissed for non-compliance with deposit deadline under Central Excise Act.</h1> <h3>M/s. Diamond Plaster Limited Shri Narendra Kumar Gautam, Auth. Signatory Shri Sumeet Gautam, Director Versus CCE, Jaipur</h3> M/s. Diamond Plaster Limited Shri Narendra Kumar Gautam, Auth. Signatory Shri Sumeet Gautam, Director Versus CCE, Jaipur - TMI Issues: Non-compliance with pre-deposit order under Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act.Analysis:1. The Appellate Tribunal had directed the main appellant to deposit an amount of Rs. 60 lakhs within 12 weeks, with compliance due on 9th March, 2015.2. On the reporting compliance date, the appellant's counsel requested a further two weeks to arrange the funds, which was granted, and the matter was listed for reporting compliance.3. During the subsequent reporting compliance date, the new counsel for the appellant requested more time to file an application for extension of time due to a shortage of funds and inability to make the pre-deposit.4. The Departmental Representative opposed granting any further time for modification of the stay order.5. After considering submissions from both sides and reviewing the records, the Tribunal found no justification for granting additional time since the initial 12-week period was already extended by two weeks at the appellant's request.6. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
