Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Money Laundering

        2015 (5) TMI 1078 - HC - Money Laundering

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Freezing Orders Upheld by Court The writ petition was dismissed as the specific account mentioned was already de-frozen, and no interference was warranted regarding the oral application ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Freezing Orders Upheld by Court

                          The writ petition was dismissed as the specific account mentioned was already de-frozen, and no interference was warranted regarding the oral application for additional reliefs. The court upheld the validity and procedural compliance of the freezing orders issued by the Directorate of Enforcement. The petitioner was advised to pursue the matter before the adjudicating authority, and the High Court declined to scrutinize the source of funds at this stage.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Freezing of the petitioner's bank account under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).
                          2. Oral application for additional reliefs not mentioned in the writ petition.
                          3. Validity of the freezing orders issued by the Directorate of Enforcement.
                          4. Compliance with procedural requirements under PMLA for freezing accounts.
                          5. Jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to scrutinize the source of funds and the actions of the authorities.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Freezing of the Petitioner's Bank Account Under PMLA:
                          The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to de-freeze a specific savings account (No. 1956915673) with the Central Bank of India, which was allegedly frozen under PMLA provisions. The respondents de-froze this account, rendering the petitioner's grievance moot. The writ petition was disposed of on this ground alone.

                          2. Oral Application for Additional Reliefs:
                          The petitioner's counsel made an oral application for de-freezing other accounts and fixed deposit receipts (FDRs) not mentioned in the writ petition. The court noted the absence of prayers and pleadings supporting the oral application, emphasizing that such reliefs require detailed fact-finding and proper pleadings. The court refused to entertain the oral application, highlighting the need for fairness to the respondents and the necessity of proper procedural adherence.

                          3. Validity of the Freezing Orders Issued by the Directorate of Enforcement:
                          The petitioner argued that the freezing order under Section 17(1A) of PMLA was unauthorized and lacked the mandatory requirement of "reasons to believe." The court examined the sequence of events, including letters and communications between the Directorate and the bank, and concluded that the formal freezing order was issued on 14.01.2015 by the Deputy Director with proper reasons recorded. The earlier communications were not statutory freezing orders.

                          4. Compliance with Procedural Requirements Under PMLA for Freezing Accounts:
                          The court scrutinized whether the freezing orders complied with Section 17(4) of PMLA, which requires filing an application before the adjudicating authority within 30 days of freezing. The Directorate filed the application on 11.02.2015, and the adjudicating authority issued a show cause notice on 23.02.2015. The court found that the procedural requirements were met, and the freezing orders were justified.

                          5. Jurisdiction of the High Court Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India:
                          The court emphasized that the power of freezing is draconian and must be exercised with safeguards. However, it also highlighted the need to balance the rights of the citizen and the investigating agency's duty to trace proceeds of crime. The court noted that the adjudicating authority is the appropriate forum to decide on the continuation of freezing orders. The High Court refrained from delving into disputed questions of fact regarding the source of funds, stating that such matters should be addressed by the adjudicating authority.

                          Conclusion:
                          The writ petition was dismissed as the specific account mentioned was already de-frozen, and no interference was warranted regarding the oral application for additional reliefs. The court upheld the validity and procedural compliance of the freezing orders issued by the Directorate of Enforcement. The petitioner was advised to pursue the matter before the adjudicating authority, and the High Court declined to scrutinize the source of funds at this stage.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found