https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188378 The writ petition was dismissed as the specific account mentioned was already de-frozen, and no interference was warranted regarding the oral application for additional reliefs. The court upheld the validity and procedural compliance of the freezing orders issued by the Directorate of Enforcement. The petitioner was advised to pursue the matter before the adjudicating authority, and the High Court declined to scrutinize the source of funds at this stage. en-us Tue, 19 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:12:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188378 The writ petition was dismissed as the specific account mentioned was already de-frozen, and no interference was warranted regarding the oral application for additional reliefs. The court upheld the validity and procedural compliance of the freezing orders issued by the Directorate of Enforcement. The petitioner was advised to pursue the matter before the adjudicating authority, and the High Court declined to scrutinize the source of funds at this stage. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 19 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188378