Appeal dismissed for late filing beyond 30 days by Appellate Tribunal; stay application denied. The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI as it was filed beyond the condonable period of thirty days. The appeal was found not ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal dismissed for late filing beyond 30 days by Appellate Tribunal; stay application denied.
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI as it was filed beyond the condonable period of thirty days. The appeal was found not maintainable and was dismissed, along with the stay/COD application.
The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI as it was filed beyond the condonable period of thirty days, following the decision in Singh Enterprises Vs. CCE, Jamshedpur. The appeal was found not maintainable and was dismissed, along with the stay/COD application.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.