Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's cotton waste plant, engaged in the manufacture of cotton yarn, fell within item No. 32 of the Fifth Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961, so as to qualify as a priority industry and attract development rebate at the higher rate of 35 per cent.
Analysis: The higher rate of development rebate depended on whether the undertaking answered the description of a priority industry under item No. 32 of the Fifth Schedule. That entry covered textiles made wholly or mainly of cotton, including cotton yarn. The Tribunal had found, as the final fact-finding authority, that the assessee was engaged in the manufacture of cotton yarn. On that finding, the statutory entry was attracted, and the cotton waste plant could not be excluded from the beneficial classification merely because of the Revenue's contrary view.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the higher development rebate at 35 per cent, and the Tribunal's view was legally correct.