Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a suit seeking a declaration that a mortgage decree is void for fraud, and consequential injunction against execution, is a suit relating to or arising out of a mortgage so as to fall within the jurisdictional bar in Item 7 of the First Schedule of the City Civil Courts Act, 1953.
Analysis: The phrases "relating to" and "arising out of" are of wide amplitude and are not confined to the original mortgage transaction alone. A suit that challenges the validity of a mortgage decree necessarily concerns the subsistence and legal effect of the mortgage relationship, because setting aside the decree would revive the mortgage, while upholding it would leave the parties in the position of judgment-debtor and judgment-creditor under the mortgage decree. On that construction, the subject-matter of the suit is sufficiently connected with the mortgage to attract the statutory exclusion.
Conclusion: The suit fell within Item 7 of the First Schedule of the City Civil Courts Act, 1953, and the City Civil Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain it.
Ratio Decidendi: Statutory expressions of wide amplitude such as "relating to" and "arising out of" extend to suits that directly or indirectly challenge the validity or continued effect of a mortgage decree, because such disputes remain sufficiently connected with the mortgage itself.