<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (2) TMI 70 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184319</link>
    <description>Expressions such as &quot;relating to&quot; and &quot;arising out of&quot; are of wide amplitude and extend beyond the original mortgage transaction. A suit challenging the validity of a mortgage decree for fraud, together with an injunction against execution, remains sufficiently connected with the mortgage because setting aside the decree would revive the mortgage, while sustaining it would preserve the decree-based relationship. On that construction, the subject-matter attracted the jurisdictional exclusion in Item 7 of the First Schedule of the City Civil Courts Act, 1953, and the City Civil Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:15:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (2) TMI 70 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184319</link>
      <description>Expressions such as &quot;relating to&quot; and &quot;arising out of&quot; are of wide amplitude and extend beyond the original mortgage transaction. A suit challenging the validity of a mortgage decree for fraud, together with an injunction against execution, remains sufficiently connected with the mortgage because setting aside the decree would revive the mortgage, while sustaining it would preserve the decree-based relationship. On that construction, the subject-matter attracted the jurisdictional exclusion in Item 7 of the First Schedule of the City Civil Courts Act, 1953, and the City Civil Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>