Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a suit filed by the official liquidator of a banking company to recover a debt due to the company is a matter relating to or arising out of the winding up of the banking company, so that the High Court has exclusive jurisdiction under sections 45A and 45B of the Banking Companies Act, 1949, and the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court is ousted.
Analysis: The expression "relating to the winding up" was treated as wider than "arising out of the winding up", and the two provisions were read together as conferring special and exclusive jurisdiction on the High Court for matters connected with winding up. A suit instituted by the official liquidator with the court's sanction was viewed as a step taken for the realisation of assets and the expeditious completion of winding up, not merely as an ordinary enforcement of pre-existing contractual rights. The legislative purpose of concentrating winding-up matters in one court and avoiding delay supported this construction, and analogous insolvency and bankruptcy provisions were relied upon to show that the jurisdiction extends to claims against third parties and pre-existing debts pursued by the insolvency representative.
Conclusion: The suit fell within the High Court's jurisdiction under section 45B, and the City Civil Court's jurisdiction was excluded under section 45A; the decision dismissing the suit was and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A suit brought by the official liquidator of a banking company for recovery of the company's assets is a matter relating to the winding up of the company, and therefore falls within the exclusive jurisdiction conferred on the High Court by the Banking Companies Act, 1949.