<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (8) TMI 8 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97133</link>
    <description>A suit filed by the official liquidator of a banking company to recover a debt due to the company was treated as a matter relating to the winding up of the company. The expression &quot;relating to the winding up&quot; was read broadly and, with &quot;arising out of the winding up,&quot; was held to confer special and exclusive jurisdiction on the High Court for connected winding-up matters. A liquidator&#039;s suit for asset realisation, brought with the court&#039;s sanction, was characterised as part of the winding-up process rather than an ordinary contractual enforcement action. The construction was supported by the legislative purpose of concentrating winding-up proceedings in one court and avoiding delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:42:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (8) TMI 8 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97133</link>
      <description>A suit filed by the official liquidator of a banking company to recover a debt due to the company was treated as a matter relating to the winding up of the company. The expression &quot;relating to the winding up&quot; was read broadly and, with &quot;arising out of the winding up,&quot; was held to confer special and exclusive jurisdiction on the High Court for connected winding-up matters. A liquidator&#039;s suit for asset realisation, brought with the court&#039;s sanction, was characterised as part of the winding-up process rather than an ordinary contractual enforcement action. The construction was supported by the legislative purpose of concentrating winding-up proceedings in one court and avoiding delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>