TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the Comptroller and Auditor General could call for and examine the books and records of private UAS licence holders for the limited purpose of verifying whether licence fee and spectrum charges payable to the Union had been correctly assessed and credited. (ii) Whether Rule 5 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Service Providers (Maintenance of Books of Accounts and other Documents) Rules, 2002 and the impugned communications were valid, and whether the Department of Telecommunications had to form an opinion of inaccuracy or misleading accounts before requiring production of records for CAG audit.
Issue (i): Whether the Comptroller and Auditor General could call for and examine the books and records of private UAS licence holders for the limited purpose of verifying whether licence fee and spectrum charges payable to the Union had been correctly assessed and credited.
Analysis: Article 149, read with Sections 13, 16 and 18 of the 1971 Act, was construed purposively in the context of spectrum as a public natural resource and of licence fee and spectrum charges as receipts payable into the Consolidated Fund of India. The licence conditions required maintenance of accounts, payment of revenue share, and production of books and documents relating to revenue. The CAG was held not to be undertaking a statutory audit of the private companies as such, but only examining the underlying records to ascertain whether the Union had received its lawful share.
Conclusion: The CAG could require production and examination of the relevant records of the service providers for the limited revenue-verification purpose, and the challenge to that extent failed.
Issue (ii): Whether Rule 5 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Service Providers (Maintenance of Books of Accounts and other Documents) Rules, 2002 and the impugned communications were valid, and whether the Department of Telecommunications had to form an opinion of inaccuracy or misleading accounts before requiring production of records for CAG audit.
Analysis: Rule 5 was read consistently with Article 149 and the 1971 Act as a supporting provision enabling the CAG to call for records bearing on revenue verification. The communications issued under Clause 22.3 of the licence were not under Clauses 22.5 or 22.6, and therefore did not depend on the Department first forming a subjective opinion that the accounts were inaccurate or misleading. Clauses 22.5 and 22.6 concerned departmental audit and special audit, which were distinct from the CAG's limited function in revenue sharing matters.
Conclusion: Rule 5 was upheld to the extent indicated, the impugned communications were sustained, and no prior formation of opinion under Clause 22.5 was required for the CAG-related audit process.
Final Conclusion: The appeals by the service providers failed, while the appeals by the Union and the Department succeeded, with the Tribunal's decision set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where licence fee and spectrum charges are revenue receipts payable into the Consolidated Fund of India, the CAG may examine the private licensee's relevant books and records for verification of the Union's lawful share, and such limited verification is distinct from a departmental audit under the licence conditions.
TaxTMI 
