High Court affirms 100% EOU's deduction eligibility under Income Tax Act; excludes specific income sources.

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court upheld the Assessee's eligibility for deduction under section 10B of the Income Tax Act as a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) from 1.11.2002. The Court directed the Assessing Officer to quantify the deduction for the period from 1.11.2002 to 31.03.2003. Additionally, the Court excluded certain income sources, such as export incentives, from the eligible income for deduction under section 10B based on relevant judicial decisions. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination, allowing both the Assessee and Revenue's appeals for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility for deduction under section 10B of the Income Tax Act.
2. Inclusion of various income sources (DEPB, Duty Draw Back, Excise Duty Refund, Interest, etc.) in the eligible income for deduction under section 10B.
3. Deduction under section 80IB for Unit 1.
4. Deduction under section 80HHC for the period prior to 1.11.2002.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 10B:
The Assessee, a company engaged in manufacturing Dyes & Dyes Intermediates, initially claimed deductions under sections 80HHC and 80IB but later revised the return to claim deduction under section 10B. The A.O. denied the claim, citing non-fulfillment of conditions and improper certification. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessee's eligibility for deduction under section 10B, noting that the Assessee was granted 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) status from 1.11.2002. The Tribunal and Hon'ble Gujarat High Court also upheld this eligibility, directing the A.O. to quantify the deduction from 1.11.2002 to 31.03.2003.

2. Inclusion of Various Income Sources in Eligible Income for Deduction under Section 10B:
During assessment, the A.O. excluded export incentives (DEPB, Duty Draw Back, Excise Duty Refund, Interest) from eligible income, referencing Supreme Court decisions in Sterling Food and Pandian Chemicals. The CIT(A) concurred, citing the Supreme Court's Liberty India judgment, which clarified that such incomes are not derived from the export of articles or things. The Assessee's bifurcation of income into two periods was noted, and the CIT(A) directed the A.O. to exclude Rs. 6,08,75,051 from eligible income under section 10B for the period 1.11.2002 to 31.03.2003.

3. Deduction under Section 80IB for Unit 1:
The CIT(A) directed the A.O. to consider the Assessee's claim for deduction under section 80IB for Unit 1 for the period 1.04.2002 to 31.10.2002, as initially claimed in the original return. The A.O. was instructed to allow this deduction per the law, keeping in mind the Supreme Court's Liberty India decision regarding the admissibility of other incomes.

4. Deduction under Section 80HHC for the Period Prior to 1.11.2002:
The CIT(A) noted that the Assessee did not fulfill the conditions laid out in the fourth proviso below sub-section(3) of section 80HHC due to an export turnover exceeding Rs. 10 crore. The A.O. was directed to work out the deduction under section 80HHC for the eligible profits for the period before 1.11.2002, as per the law.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the A.O. for fresh examination of the Assessee's claims, particularly the bifurcation of income and the eligibility of various income sources for deduction under section 10B. The A.O. was directed to verify these claims in light of relevant judicial decisions and provide the Assessee an opportunity to present additional evidence. The appeals by both the Assessee and Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.

Order Pronounced in Open Court on 07-03-2014.

---