1996 (2) TMI 29 - HC - Income Tax

High Court instructs Tribunal on key tax law interpretation, emphasizes importance, sets deadline for case statement submission

Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Asian Techs Limited

Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Asian Techs Limited - [1997] 226 ITR 672, 135 CTR 161 Issues:- Interpretation of provisions under sections 80HH, 80-I, and 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961.- Determination of whether the assessee qualifies as an industrial undertaking.- Consideration of whether the assessee is entitled to deductions under the mentioned sections for profits related to construction activities.Analysis:The case involved a petition filed by the Commissioner of Income-tax seeking reference of questions of law arising from an appellate order. The assessee, a company engaged in engineering contracts, claimed deductions under sections 80HH, 80-I, and 80J of the Income-tax Act for the year 1983-84. The claim was based on the assertion that the assessee, in executing construction work, manufactured articles used in the process, thereby qualifying for the deductions. However, the assessing authority and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) rejected the claim, stating that the assessee was not an industrial undertaking.The matter was taken to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, which referred to a previous decision involving the interpretation of the term 'article or thing' in section 80-I. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee was entitled to the benefits of the provisions based on the interpretation provided in the earlier decision. The Tribunal's decision was influenced by a similar case before the High Court of Bombay and a question raised before the Supreme Court regarding the interpretation of relevant provisions.Given the importance and lack of authoritative pronouncement on the issue, the High Court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer the questions of law for the court's decision. The court emphasized the significance of the matter, especially in light of previous decisions by other courts and the Supreme Court's reservation on a related question. The Tribunal was instructed to submit the statement of the case within three months for further consideration.In conclusion, the judgment addressed the interpretation of provisions under sections 80HH, 80-I, and 80J, the determination of the assessee's status as an industrial undertaking, and the entitlement to deductions for profits related to construction activities. The decision highlighted the need for clarification on the important legal question raised in the case, necessitating a reference to the High Court for resolution.