Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was required to reverse Cenvat credit on inputs used in job work undertaken for others where the goods were cleared on payment of duty.
Analysis: The issue was treated as settled by prior Tribunal decisions and by the Supreme Court-based reasoning applied in earlier connected matters. The Commissioner (Appeals) had relied on the Larger Bench ruling in Sterlite Industries, and the Tribunal noted that similar demands against the same assessee had already been dropped in earlier proceedings. The Revenue's challenge was also weakened by the rejection of its appeal by the High Court, which found no reason to depart from the Supreme Court's decision in Escorts Limited.
Conclusion: The assessee was not required to reverse the Cenvat credit on the inputs used for the job work, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs used in job work relate to goods cleared on payment of duty, the Cenvat credit taken on such inputs is allowable and need not be reversed.