1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Manufacturing company wins Modvat credit appeal for inputs used by job worker, citing precedent</h1> The appellant, engaged in manufacturing paper covered copper strips, was granted entitlement to Modvat credit for inputs used by a job worker. The ... Modvat/Cenvat Issues involved: Entitlement to Modvat credit for inputs used by job worker; Admissibility of Modvat credit on insulated craft paper; Captive consumption of inputs for final products.Entitlement to Modvat credit for inputs used by job worker: The appellant, engaged in manufacturing paper covered copper strips, received inputs from the principal manufacturer for processing and subsequent return. Duty on final products paid by principal manufacturer. Show cause notice alleged inadmissible Modvat credit on insulated craft paper used in processing of copper wire/rods. Assistant Commissioner and appellate authority upheld the demand. Appellant referred to Tribunal judgment in Jindal Polymers case, where similar claim was upheld. Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order.Admissibility of Modvat credit on insulated craft paper: Appellant's inputs captively consumed for final products cleared by themselves and on job work basis. Tribunal's judgment in Jindal Polymers case deemed applicable to this scenario. Appeal allowed, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief.Captive consumption of inputs for final products: Appellant's inputs used for final products cleared by themselves and on job work basis. Tribunal's decision in Jindal Polymers case considered relevant. Both appeals allowed, with consequential relief granted after setting aside the impugned orders.