Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on inputs used by a job worker in processing goods received from the principal manufacturer and on inputs captively consumed in the manufacture of final products cleared by the assessee.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the applicability of the Tribunal's earlier decision in Jindal Polymers, which had recognised credit entitlement in comparable job-work situations. The assessee's inputs were used in relation to goods processed under the job-work arrangement and returned to the principal manufacturer, while in the connected appeal the inputs were used for manufacture of final products cleared by the assessee itself. On the facts, both situations were treated as covered by the same controlling principle governing Modvat credit availability and the exclusion under Rule 57C was not applied so as to deny credit.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was held admissible to the assessee in both appeals, and the orders denying credit were set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs are used in a recognised job-work or captive-consumption manufacturing arrangement covered by the governing Modvat scheme, credit cannot be denied merely because the processed goods are cleared without duty by the principal manufacturer or are otherwise cleared in the course of the same manufacturing arrangement.