Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of polyester/polymer chips cleared without payment of duty under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. could be denied by invoking Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The appellants manufactured polyester/polymer chips on job work basis and cleared them without duty to the parent manufacturer, while the final filament yarn manufactured by the parent unit was cleared on payment of duty. The Tribunal treated the appellants as operating under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. and applied the principle earlier laid down in the context of Notification No. 217/86, namely that Rule 57C must be read in the setting of the Modvat scheme and not so mechanically as to defeat the credit chain where the intermediate clearances are part of an integrated manufacturing arrangement leading to dutiable final products. On that approach, the intermediate clearance of the chips did not justify denial of credit on the inputs used by the job worker.
Conclusion: Rule 57C did not bar the Modvat credit claimed by the appellants, and the disallowance of credit and penalty were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where intermediate goods are cleared without duty under a job-work notification as part of a manufacturing chain culminating in dutiable final products, Modvat credit cannot be denied by a mechanical application of the nil-rate exemption bar; the Modvat scheme requires the credit chain to be preserved.