Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit was admissible on inputs used in goods manufactured on job-work basis and cleared under Notification No. 214/86.
Analysis: The entitlement to credit turned on whether the benefit could extend to inputs used in job-work goods when the finished products were ultimately cleared on payment of duty by the principal manufacturer. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that, where the final products are excisable and duty is paid at the end of the chain, the credit chain is not broken merely because the appellant undertakes job work and clears semifinished goods under Notification No. 214/86.
Conclusion: MODVAT credit was admissible and the denial of credit and penalty were not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where job-work goods ultimately form part of dutiable final products cleared on payment of excise duty, MODVAT credit on eligible inputs cannot be denied merely because the intermediate clearance is made under Notification No. 214/86.