Anti-dumping duty dispute became infructuous after the Government stated no duty was necessary

A petition seeking a direction to impose anti-dumping duty lost its basis once the Government stated by affidavit that it did not consider such duty necessary. Because a final finding had already been submitted under the anti-dumping framework, the grievance that no decision had been taken no longer survived. The contention that there was no formal order or that reasons had not been communicated was treated as not germane to the petition. The matter was therefore not taken forward and was disposed of, with liberty to pursue other remedies available in law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petition seeking a direction to the Union of India to impose anti-dumping duty survived after the Government filed an affidavit stating that it did not find it necessary to impose such duty.

Analysis: A final finding had already been submitted by the designated authority under the anti-dumping framework. During the proceedings, the Union of India placed on record its decision that no anti-dumping duty was required to be imposed. In that situation, the principal grievance that the Government had failed to take a decision no longer survived. The additional contention regarding absence of a formal order or non-communication of reasons was treated as not germane to the petition.

Conclusion: The petition did not warrant further adjudication and was disposed of, leaving the petitioner to pursue any other remedies available in law.

---