1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court of Bombay issues directions on pollution & revival of Mithi River, mandates compliance with prevention measures</h1> The High Court of Bombay issued specific directions in response to a petition regarding the pollution and degeneration of the Mithi River. The Court ... - Issues: Pollution and Degeneration of Mithi River, Revival Plan, Legal Directions for PreventionIn this judgment by the High Court of Bombay, the Petitioner presented a comprehensive action plan for the revival of the Mithi River, highlighting its original status and current condition. The plan included steps such as prevention of waste dumping, desilting, stopping encroachments, and controlling pollution sources. The Petitioner also suggested actions for various authorities like the Airport Authority, State Government, and Pollution Control Board to revive the River. The Court acknowledged the pollution issues caused by industrial effluents, waste dumping, and diversions, and deemed it necessary to pass directions for revival and prevention. After hearing all parties, the Court issued specific directions, including identifying illegal commercial units, monitoring waste discharge, preventing encroachments, and ensuring proper garbage collection. The Court mandated strict compliance with these directions and required filing of reply-affidavits by relevant authorities to confirm compliance within specified timelines. Additionally, the Airport Authority was directed to provide necessary information promptly. The Advocate General informed the Court about the formation of the 'Mithi River Development and Protection Authority' and was directed to update on the committee's actions. The Court appreciated the Petitioner's detailed action report and scheduled the next hearing for further proceedings on the matter.