Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to subsequent order. Advocates: Shri Gopal Verma for petitioner, Shri Vinod Kant for respondents. The Allahabad HC dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to a subsequent Order-in-Original. Shri Gopal Verma represented the petitioner, while Shri ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to subsequent order. Advocates: Shri Gopal Verma for petitioner, Shri Vinod Kant for respondents.
The Allahabad HC dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to a subsequent Order-in-Original. Shri Gopal Verma represented the petitioner, while Shri Vinod Kant appeared for the respondents.
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because an Order-in-Original had been passed after the petition was filed. Shri Gopal Verma represented the petitioner. Shri Vinod Kant appeared for the respondents. (2013 (9) TMI 1048 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.